Outside In Companies Continue to Dominate 05/09/2011
2011 marks the sixth year in which Millward Brown Optimor has published the ranking of the BrandZ Top 100 Most Valuable Global Brands. Together with 13 years of global brand equity data, these six years of brand valuation analyses provide strong evidence of the importance of branding for business leaders. In conjunction with this research, The BP Group (www.BPGroup.org) have identified those companies that have implemented an Outside In Strategy, those companies that are mixed model and those companies that are still Inside Out and here are the results. In summary, 6 out of the top 10 companies by brand value had implemented an Outside In strategy by 2009, 8 out of the top 10 had implemented an Outside In strategy by 2010 and 8 out of the top 10 had implemented an Outside In strategy by 2011. It is also interesting to observe the continuing demise of Nokia, down from 13th in 2009 to 81st in 2011. Add Comment 2010 marks the fifth year in which Millward Brown Optimor has published the ranking of the BrandZ Top 100 Most Valuable Global Brands. Together with 12 years of global brand equity data, these five years of brand valuation analyses provide strong evidence of the importance of branding for business leaders. In conjunction with this research, The BP Group (www.BPGroup.org) have identified those companies that have implemented an Outside In Strategy, those companies that are mixed model and those companies that are still Inside Out and here are the results. In summary, 6 out of the top 10 companies by brand value had implemented an Outside In strategy by 2009, whilst 8 out of the top 10 had implemented an Outside In strategy by 2010. References: BrandZ Top 100 2010 - http://bit.ly/ai00Jh Successful Customer Outcomes Blogspot - http://bit.ly/dx5NTJ Knowledge@Wharton interviewed George Day about the challenges companies face in implementing "outside in" strategy, especially during a recession; what benefits companies can realize by adopting this approach, and which companies have done this well and which haven't, among other topics. In the video, he discusses his book's contribution to the ongoing debate over marketing strategy, and relates how McDonald's used an "outside-in" approach to turn around its business. See http://bit.ly/9hFUB4 Developing Outside In Software Systems 10/10/2010
Turning Feedback Into Inspiration (1) Steve Jobs has often cited this quote from Henry Ford: "If I'd have asked customers what they wanted, they would have told me, 'A faster horse!' " This is Jobs's defense of Apple's reluctance to listen to even its most passionate customers, and the line is a good one to remember the next time you're considering a new round of focus groups. "The whole approach of the company is that people can't really envision what they want," says Reid. "They'll tell you a bunch of stuff they want. Then if you build it, it turns out that's not right. It's hard to visualize things that don't exist." But Jobs doesn't exactly ignore customers; he uses their ideas as inspiration, not direction; as a means, not an end. Ever since the netbook boom began, many people have begged Apple to put out its own. These tiny, ultra-portable machines represented the fastest-growing segment of the PC business, and the company seemed to be missing out. Some people (yours truly included) even went so far as to hack PC netbooks in order to run the Mac OS. Jobs could not have been more dismissive. "We don't know how to make a $500 computer that's not a piece of junk," he said of the prospect of an Apple netbook. Cut to January 2010, and there's Jobs unveiling a $500 computer that isn't a piece of junk. But the iPad isn't a netbook. It's both more, and less -- not just a faster horse. Outside In Software Development So, are traditional software development methodologies using an Inside Out approach and could this be a significant factor in the failure, or mediocre success, of most software development projects? It is interesting to consider this paradigm in the context of Steve Jobs' comments. I believe traditional software development lifecycle projects typically use an Inside Out approach to developing solutions. That is, they use an approach where users or customers are asked what they want, typically during user interviews and workshops. The responses gathered during these sessions are then collated in the form of a business requirements document. This document then forms the basis from which systems are developed and tested and are said to comply with the requirements. The problem here is that once users have been asked what they want, nobody is performing an analysis of what they really need. Wants are translated into business requirements without any regard for understanding the really need, from the user perspective or from the Outside In. Outside In describes a way of analysing a situation by examining it from a user perspective and in doing so, it aims to provide value to the user. Outside In Software Development is an approach whose focus is to provide value to a system’s users. By using scenarios and stories, the Outside In approach provides development teams with a clear understanding of users’ needs, bringing them out of their IT domain into the user domain and thus reducing the incidence of systems which do not fulfil user’s requirements. Added benefits of this approach include:
References (1) Invincible Apple: 10 Lessons From the Coolest Company Anywhere http://bit.ly/bOb6S5 An Introduction to Outside-in Development http://bit.ly/cOjCXM What is Outside In? 09/13/2010
Ever wanted to know what Outside In is? Well, Charles Bennett, Certified Process Master, BP Group Commercial Director provides a perspective on introducing Outside-In in this white paper. Download it here or click on the image below. Megan James, Event Director IQPC, interviews Steve Towers, CEO & Founder, BP Group and co-host for the Next Generation BPM Summit about outside-in process thinking and plans for the 2011 Summit. Visit the Summit home page here. The demise of the Australian retailer 07/16/2010
Walk through any shopping centre and it is hard to miss the “Sale” signs out front of nearly every retail outlet. There is no doubt retailers are doing it tough right now but should this be a surprise to us. If we look around the retail landscape, there have been very few significant changes in the past 30-40 years. Unfortunately, with this inability to adapt to change, retailers falsely believe that the only thing they can compete on is price. As prices continue this downward spiral, you could assume the winner would be the consumer; but at what cost? Prices may be going down and as a consumer, you may think this is a good thing but unfortunately, the price squeezing is also having a negative impact on the quality of products. Think of it, with the exception of LEGO, when was the last toy you bought that managed to survive longer than its batteries? Price reductions have also played a significant part in the decline in customer service to the point where today, customer service has gotten so bad that if it is not terrible, we as customers are relieved. Contrast this to consumer behaviour, which has changed dramatically over the last 30-40 years, in particular the past decade. We are now in a new are, the era of the enlightened customer. At the end of the first decade of the 21st century, this so called enlightened customer has emerged as a result of a number of factors.
There is something else to be fearful of on the horizon, successful international retailers are now establishing a foothold in Australia. These retailers have succeeded overseas and now see plenty of an opportunity in Australia and this may change things forever. One of the newest arrivals scheduled to reach our shores in the near future is Zara, the Spanish fashion company. Behind the success of Zara is a complete and total alignment to what customer’s really need. They have truly challenged the fashion industry, turning it on its head by doing something that few thought possible. Where it used to take the leading fashion retailers in excess of 18 months to get fashion to consumers, Zara’s model is all about velocity and they can now put fashions in store in less than two weeks. No more waiting to purchase next year’s fashions, at Zara you can have fashion now. Few signs of this type of innovation exist in Australian retailers. It is not too late, but Australian retailers must understand that the game has changed. It is no longer sufficient to wait for customers to enter your store because the customer experience starts well before the customer leaves their home and the experience is not over until they return. There is still an opportunity for success, but it will take a significant mind shift. It is time to stop trying to trick customers with gimmicks or over promising and under delivering; it is now time to change perspective, to look at the retail experience from the customer’s perspective, to take an outside in approach. By changing the focus to the entire customer value chain, and by making a commitment to making their lives easier, simpler and more successful, opportunities abound. And it is precisely this change and this commitment to deliver value to customers, to truly understand the needs of customers, this shift in focus toward the success of the customer that is at the heart of the success of some of this century’s most successful companies. Does a seller (or buyer) really care how many properties a real estate agent has sold this year, or what the value of the properties they sold is. In fact, even the best real estate agent spending thousands of dollars on advertising and marketing to sell a property will not guarantee its sale. So a lot of the time picking an agent comes down to price, luck or more often these days it comes down to community; word of mouth. A real estate agent is someone who acts as an intermediary between buyers and sellers of property, trying to find sellers who wish to sell and buyers who wish to buy. Estate agents typically provide marketing services for sellers to assist them sell for the highest possible price, and assist buyers by helping them purchase property for the lowest possible price under the best terms. While the act of selling a property or buying a property may be the most important steps in moving house, there are a significant number of steps that need to occur to ensure a move is successful. A customer must find a solicitor to deal with the contracts, ensure they have finance available, ensure they have a removalist organised, make sure insurance is organised, organise any number of trades and service people to clean, wash, paint, fix and mend. So the question is, who is actually delivering the service that the customer really needs? Whose responsibility is it to ensure that a customer is getting what they need? Well, estate agents may be selling a house, helping to buy another house for a customer but does this alone make the process a successful one? What about the steps in the middle. I’d say the answer right now is nobody provides what customers really need. So if a real estate agent was looking do differentiate themselves from their competition, perhaps the best way is to make one customers life easier, simpler and more successful by delivering the all services they really need, taking an outside in approach, seeking opportunity in the customer value chain. Then when one of their friends asks which real estate to use, they will have no hesitation in recommending the services of the real estate that delivers the full service. I frequently use public transport to get around Sydney and when I recently found myself needing to get home in a hurry. I quickly went to Wynyard and saw a bus I knew would take me home. Unfortunately the driver was attending to something in the cabin at the time and the bus doors were closed so I waited patiently outside the bus, waiting for him to return but also in the knowledge that I only had the correct fare sitting in my hand and not a pre-paid ticket as the ticket machine was some distance away. Eventually the driver returned, opened the door, I stepped onto the bus, indicated where I wanted to go and went to hand him my money when he said you need a ticket and I'm about to go. So I missed the bus. Reluctantly I went to the ticket machine to purchase a ticket. I was asked which ticket I wanted, told how much it would cost and after paying the money, I got what I payed for, a ticket. Nothing more, nothing less, just a ticket. Not surprising as this was a ticket machine but you would think with today's technology, over 40 years after the first man landed on the moon with hand held mobile devices that play music, record video and even allow you to talk to other people, that a machine capable of dispensing a ticket could do more than just dispense tickets. For example, there are a number of ways of getting around the city, bus, train, ferry, walking. There are even a number of buses that can take you to the same destination, some faster than others. If my goal was to reach a destination in the shortest possible time, why couldn't this marvel of modern science, the ticket machine, ask me my destination, calculate the quickest way to get there, provide me with a number of trip alternatives and dispense the appropriate ticket. Why is the onus on the passenger to understand which ticket they need and which bus stop to go to to get to their destination in the shortest possible time. I guess there are two answer to these questions:
Say you are planning the trip of a lifetime to an exotic location, just you and your partner. You start getting excited once you have made the decision to go and the next day you book your holiday leave with work and front the travel agent to plan the big adventure. You spend weeks looking through the glossy holiday brochures, days talking to family and friends, hours talking to travel agents and then you finally choose your holiday. The day arrives when you make the trip to the travel agent to book everything, the flights, the hotels, the transfers, the insurance and then you come to a big moment of truth, payment. In order to secure your holiday, you’ve got to pay a deposit of 30%, 90 days prior to departure and the balance, 30 days prior to departure. You’ve got some money set aside but you and your partner need to save money over the remaining time to have enough to pay for the trip whilst also having enough spending money. So, you need to set yourself multiple financial goals in order to book your holiday, pay the balance and have enough spending money. Go to the bank right now and they can offer you any number of accounts, savings accounts and term deposits all with different interest rates, fees and conditions. How many of these bank accounts are truly aligned to the success of the customer, in this case the holiday maker? The holiday maker’s success in this case is to have a fantastic holiday. How many of these accounts help the holiday maker’s life easier simpler and more successful. What could this account look like? 1. It should be easy to set-up - perhaps an online account 2. It should be easy to deposit funds – in person and online 3. It should know the customer goals – how much money is needed and when 4. It should provide a competitive interest rate – help the customer achieve the goal and don’t charge fees 5. It should encourage regular saving – provide regular updates, show how much needs to be saved per week/per month and how close the goal is 6. It should automatically pay the deposit and balance when they are due – don’t put the onus on the customer to make the payments, schedule the payments automatically 7. It should be flexible enough to be used for buying things when on the holiday – don’t suspend activity on the account because of suspicious international transactions, the customer is on holiday 8. It should be easy to close – when the holiday is finished and the customer returns home, close the account – no fees, just confirm the customer is safely home and close it. If one bank can get this right, they will be on a winner and on their way to becoming outside in. Then someone will see there are other revenue opportunities in the customer value chain like insurance, what about if the bank partners with a hotel chain or airline so that the customer can get a discount on their holiday. Then there are the day trips, restaurants, shopping, photos & video, potential partnership and revenue opportunities for the bank but more importantly opportunities to make customers lives easier, simpler and more successful. Success will breed success, the next thing might be a car account, then an education account, then who knows, maybe even a home account. | David Mottershead
Managing Consultant, Process & Customer Experience Advocate and Certified Process Master ArchivesJune 2011 CategoriesAll |