Outside In Consulting
  • Home
  • Your Challenges
    • Process Improvement
      • Innovation
        • Reduce Costs
          • Increase Revenue
            • Enhance Products
              • Enhance Service
                • Breaking Down Silos
                  • Bridge The Business Technology Gap
                    • Agile Business Architecture
                      • Business Process Management
                        • Marketing Strategy
                        • Our Methods
                        • Successes
                        • Resources
                          • Outside In Glossary
                          • Training
                          • Services
                            • Customer Experience Assessment
                              • Corporate Innovation Programme
                              • Case Studies
                              • Contact Us
                              Outside In Companies Continue to Dominate 05/09/2011
                              0 Comments
                               
                              2011 marks the sixth year in which Millward Brown Optimor has published the ranking of the BrandZ Top 100 Most Valuable Global Brands. Together with 13 years of global brand equity data, these six years of brand valuation analyses provide strong evidence of the importance of branding for business leaders.

                              In conjunction with this research, The BP Group (www.BPGroup.org) have identified those companies that have implemented an Outside In Strategy, those companies that are mixed model and those companies that are still Inside Out and here are the results. In summary, 6 out of the top 10 companies by brand value had implemented an Outside In strategy by 2009, 8 out of the top 10 had implemented an Outside In strategy by 2010 and 8 out of the top 10 had implemented an Outside In strategy by 2011. It is also interesting to observe the continuing demise of Nokia, down from 13th in 2009 to 81st in 2011.
                              Picture
                              Picture
                              Picture
                              Add Comment
                               
                              Is An Outside In Strategy a Winning Strategy? 11/04/2010
                              0 Comments
                               
                              2010 marks the fifth year in which Millward Brown Optimor has published the ranking of the BrandZ Top 100 Most Valuable Global Brands. Together with 12 years of global brand equity data, these five years of brand valuation analyses provide strong evidence of the importance of branding for business leaders.

                              In conjunction with this research, The BP Group (www.BPGroup.org) have identified those companies that have implemented an Outside In Strategy, those companies that are mixed model and those companies that are still Inside Out and here are the results. In summary, 6 out of the top 10 companies by brand value had implemented an Outside In strategy by 2009, whilst 8 out of the top 10 had implemented an Outside In strategy by 2010.
                              Picture
                              Picture
                              Picture
                              References:
                              BrandZ Top 100 2010 - http://bit.ly/ai00Jh
                              Successful Customer Outcomes Blogspot - http://bit.ly/dx5NTJ

                              Add Comment
                               
                              Strategy from the Outside In: Profiting from Customer Value. 10/10/2010
                              1 Comment
                               
                              Knowledge@Wharton interviewed George Day about the challenges companies face in implementing "outside in" strategy, especially during a recession; what benefits companies can realize by adopting this approach, and which companies have done this well and which haven't, among other topics. In the video, he discusses his book's contribution to the ongoing debate over marketing strategy, and relates how McDonald's used an "outside-in" approach to turn around its business. See http://bit.ly/9hFUB4
                              1 Comment
                               
                              Developing Outside In Software Systems 10/10/2010
                              0 Comments
                               
                              Turning Feedback Into Inspiration (1)

                              Steve Jobs has often cited this quote from Henry Ford: "If I'd have asked customers what they wanted, they would have told me, 'A faster horse!' "

                              This is Jobs's defense of Apple's reluctance to listen to even its most passionate customers, and the line is a good one to remember the next time you're considering a new round of focus groups. "The whole approach of the company is that people can't really envision what they want," says Reid. "They'll tell you a bunch of stuff they want. Then if you build it, it turns out that's not right. It's hard to visualize things that don't exist."

                              But Jobs doesn't exactly ignore customers; he uses their ideas as inspiration, not direction; as a means, not an end. Ever since the netbook boom began, many people have begged Apple to put out its own. These tiny, ultra-portable machines represented the fastest-growing segment of the PC business, and the company seemed to be missing out. Some people (yours truly included) even went so far as to hack PC netbooks in order to run the Mac OS. Jobs could not have been more dismissive. "We don't know how to make a $500 computer that's not a piece of junk," he said of the prospect of an Apple netbook.

                              Cut to January 2010, and there's Jobs unveiling a $500 computer that isn't a piece of junk. But the iPad isn't a netbook. It's both more, and less -- not just a faster horse.

                              Outside In Software Development

                              So, are traditional software development methodologies using an Inside Out approach and could this be a significant factor in the failure, or mediocre success, of most software development projects? It is interesting to consider this paradigm in the context of Steve Jobs' comments. I believe traditional software development lifecycle projects typically use an Inside Out approach to developing solutions. That is, they use an approach where users or customers are asked what they want, typically during user interviews and workshops. The responses gathered during these sessions are then collated in the form of a business requirements document. This document then forms the basis from which systems are developed and tested and are said to comply with the requirements.

                              The problem here is that once users have been asked what they want, nobody is performing an analysis of what they really need. Wants are translated into business requirements without any regard for understanding the really need, from the user perspective or from the Outside In.  Outside In describes a way of analysing a situation by examining it from a user perspective and in doing so, it aims to provide value to the user.

                              Outside In Software Development is an approach whose focus is to provide value to a system’s users. By using scenarios and stories, the Outside In approach provides development teams with a clear understanding of users’ needs, bringing them out of their IT domain into the user domain and thus reducing the incidence of systems which do not fulfil user’s requirements. Added benefits of this approach include:
                              • Leads to simpler and more cohesive systems, because developers will write only the minimum amount of code to satisfy the user requirements.
                              • Minimal code reduces the costs associated with system maintenance.
                              • Development, testing and implementation times are minimised.
                              • Testing is performed based on real user scenarios ensuring higher code quality.
                              • Reduced project time means risk.
                              • Ensuring user needs are addressed ensures greater customer satisfaction.
                              An Outside In Software Development is one of the latest Agile approaches to software development and can be used in conjunction with the CEMMethod, ensuring a successful software development outcome.

                              References
                              (1) Invincible Apple: 10 Lessons From the Coolest Company Anywhere http://bit.ly/bOb6S5
                              An Introduction to Outside-in Development http://bit.ly/cOjCXM

                              Add Comment
                               
                              What is Outside In? 09/13/2010
                              0 Comments
                               
                              Ever wanted to know what Outside In is? Well, Charles Bennett, Certified Process Master, BP Group Commercial Director provides a perspective on introducing Outside-In in this white paper. Download it here or click on the image below.
                              Picture
                              Add Comment
                               
                              BPM TV: Outside-In Thinking: The Ticket to Achieving a Successful Customer Outcome 08/24/2010
                              0 Comments
                               
                              Megan James, Event Director IQPC, interviews Steve Towers, CEO & Founder, BP Group and co-host for the Next Generation BPM Summit about outside-in process thinking and plans for the 2011 Summit. Visit the Summit home page here.
                              Add Comment
                               
                              The demise of the Australian retailer 07/16/2010
                              0 Comments
                               
                              Walk through any shopping centre and it is hard to miss the “Sale” signs out front of nearly every retail outlet. There is no doubt retailers are doing it tough right now but should this be a surprise to us. If we look around the retail landscape, there have been very few significant changes in the past 30-40 years.

                              Unfortunately, with this inability to adapt to change, retailers falsely believe that the only thing they can compete on is price. As prices continue this downward spiral, you could assume the winner would be the consumer; but at what cost? Prices may be going down and as a consumer, you may think this is a good thing but unfortunately, the price squeezing is also having a negative impact on the quality of products. Think of it, with the exception of LEGO, when was the last toy you bought that managed to survive longer than its batteries? Price reductions have also played a significant part in the decline in customer service to the point where today, customer service has gotten so bad that if it is not terrible, we as customers are relieved.

                              Contrast this to consumer behaviour, which has changed dramatically over the last 30-40 years, in particular the past decade. We are now in a new are, the era of the enlightened customer. At the end of the first decade of the 21st century, this so called enlightened customer has emerged as a result of a number of factors.
                              • Customers today have so much choice: there are so many more retailers offering the same, or similar, products and services, customers have a myriad of retailers to choose from.
                              • Customers have become promiscuous: where generations before showed loyalty to their retailers, generations today show little evidence of that same loyalty.
                              • The rise of the prosumer: many customers do their research on their products and services prior to entering the store. In many situations, customers often know more about their purchase than the person selling to them.
                              • Customers have become rebellious: it was once said that when a customer had a bad experience, they were likely to tell 20 people. In today’s always on society, if a customer has a bad experience, they could be telling millions of people through social networking sites in a minute. Think of the impact this can have on a retailer’s brand.
                              • Customer expectations are changing: many retail outlets, such as the Apple stores, are changing customers’ expectations forever. When customers experience the level of service they receive in an Apple store, there expectation is changing and they are craving the same level of service from other retailers.
                              • Multiple channels: customers want to do business their way, through the channel of their choice and they expect the same level of service through every channel.
                              With competition at an all time high, customer service, prices and quality at an all time low, Australian retailers have shown few signs of changing their game or doing things differently. The only answer seems to be to increase the marketing and reduce the margins.

                              There is something else to be fearful of on the horizon, successful international retailers are now establishing a foothold in Australia. These retailers have succeeded overseas and now see plenty of an opportunity in Australia and this may change things forever.

                              One of the newest arrivals scheduled to reach our shores in the near future is Zara, the Spanish fashion company. Behind the success of Zara is a complete and total alignment to what customer’s really need. They have truly challenged the fashion industry, turning it on its head by doing something that few thought possible. Where it used to take the leading fashion retailers in excess of 18 months to get fashion to consumers, Zara’s model is all about velocity and they can now put fashions in store in less than two weeks. No more waiting to purchase next year’s fashions, at Zara you can have fashion now.

                              Few signs of this type of innovation exist in Australian retailers. It is not too late, but Australian retailers must understand that the game has changed. It is no longer sufficient to wait for customers to enter your store because the customer experience starts well before the customer leaves their home and the experience is not over until they return.

                              There is still an opportunity for success, but it will take a significant mind shift. It is time to stop trying to trick customers with gimmicks or over promising and under delivering; it is now time to change perspective, to look at the retail experience from the customer’s perspective, to take an outside in approach.

                              By changing the focus to the entire customer value chain, and by making a commitment to making their lives easier, simpler and more successful, opportunities abound. And it is precisely this change and this commitment to deliver value to customers, to truly understand the needs of customers, this shift in focus toward the success of the customer that is at the heart of the success of some of this century’s most successful companies.

                              Add Comment
                               
                              How can real estate agents differentiate themselves from their competition? 07/12/2010
                              0 Comments
                               
                              Does a seller (or buyer) really care how many properties a real estate agent has sold this year, or what the value of the properties they sold is. In fact, even the best real estate agent spending thousands of dollars on advertising and marketing to sell a property will not guarantee its sale. So a lot of the time picking an agent comes down to price, luck or more often these days it comes down to community; word of mouth.

                              A real estate agent is someone who acts as an intermediary between buyers and sellers of property, trying to find sellers who wish to sell and buyers who wish to buy. Estate agents typically provide marketing services for sellers to assist them sell for the highest possible price, and assist buyers by helping them purchase property for the lowest possible price under the best terms.

                              While the act of selling a property or buying a property may be the most important steps in moving house, there are a significant number of steps that need to occur to ensure a move is successful. A customer must find a solicitor to deal with the contracts, ensure they have finance available, ensure they have a removalist organised, make sure insurance is organised, organise any number of trades and service people to clean, wash, paint, fix and mend.

                              So the question is, who is actually delivering the service that the customer really needs? Whose responsibility is it to ensure that a customer is getting what they need? Well, estate agents may be selling a house, helping to buy another house for a customer but does this alone make the process a successful one? What about the steps in the middle. I’d say the answer right now is nobody provides what customers really need. So if a real estate agent was looking do differentiate themselves from their competition, perhaps the best way is to make one customers life easier, simpler and more successful by delivering the all services they really need, taking an outside in approach, seeking opportunity in  the customer value chain. Then when one of their friends asks which real estate to use, they will have no hesitation in recommending the services of the real estate that delivers the full service.

                              Add Comment
                               
                              Transport NSW - Why do MyZone ticket machines only sell tickets? 07/11/2010
                              0 Comments
                               
                              I frequently use public transport to get around Sydney and when I recently found myself needing to get home in a hurry. I quickly went to Wynyard and saw a bus I knew would take me home. Unfortunately the driver was attending to something in the cabin at the time and the bus doors were closed so I waited patiently outside the bus, waiting for him to return but also in the knowledge that I only had the correct fare sitting in my hand and not a pre-paid ticket as the ticket machine was some distance away. Eventually the driver returned, opened the door, I stepped onto the bus, indicated where I wanted to go and went to hand him my money when he said you need a ticket and I'm about to go. So I missed the bus.

                              Reluctantly I went to the ticket machine to purchase a ticket. I was asked which ticket I wanted, told how much it would cost and after paying the money, I got what I payed for, a ticket. Nothing more, nothing less, just a ticket. Not surprising as this was a ticket machine but you would think with today's technology, over 40 years after the first man landed on the moon with hand held mobile devices that play music, record video and even allow you to talk to other people, that a machine capable of dispensing a ticket could do more than just dispense tickets.

                              For example, there are a number of ways of getting around the city, bus, train, ferry, walking. There are even a number of buses that can take you to the same destination, some faster than others. If my goal was to reach a destination in the shortest possible time, why couldn't this marvel of modern science, the ticket machine, ask me my destination, calculate the quickest way to get there, provide me with a number of trip alternatives and dispense the appropriate ticket. Why is the onus on the passenger to understand which ticket they need and which bus stop to go to to get to their destination in the shortest possible time.

                              I guess there are two answer to these questions:
                              1. Passengers needed to have tickets before boarding the public transport system and Transport NSW had to have a way of dispensing tickets to passengers so immediately they looked for a ticket dispensing machine.
                              2. After identifying a desire to "efficiently" dispense tickets, there goal was then to find someone that could supply ticket dispensing machine. They didn't look to address the needs of the customer, that is, how can we assist a passenger on their journey, what they did do is address an internal need to dispense tickets and so they ended up with ticket machines, nothing more, nothing less, the ticket machine does what it says it does.
                              So many times do we see the root of all system design problems being a lack of understanding or lack of articulation of the successful customer outcome. The result of this is inside out thinking and an approach to developing systems with a complete ignorance of the customer. Had Transport NSW looked to address the customer need and taken an Outside In approach, the resulting ticket machine system could have been more like an automated travel kiosk, capable of helping customer reach their destination by the most efficient means, achieving a successful customer outcome and making passengers lives easier, simpler and more successful. Alas, we are left with ticket dispensing machines and confused passengers.
                              Add Comment
                               
                              Any bank can have my business if they can create a bank account like this! 07/07/2010
                              2 Comments
                               
                              Say you are planning the trip of a lifetime to an exotic location, just you and your partner. You start getting excited once you have made the decision to go and the next day you book your holiday leave with work and front the travel agent to plan the big adventure. You spend weeks looking through the glossy holiday brochures, days talking to family and friends, hours talking to travel agents and then you finally choose your holiday.

                              The day arrives when you make the trip to the travel agent to book everything, the flights, the hotels, the transfers, the insurance and then you come to a big moment of truth, payment. In order to secure your holiday, you’ve got to pay a deposit of 30%, 90 days prior to departure and the balance, 30 days prior to departure. You’ve got some money set aside but you and your partner need to save money over the remaining time to have enough to pay for the trip whilst also having enough spending money.

                              So, you need to set yourself multiple financial goals in order to book your holiday, pay the balance and have enough spending money. Go to the bank right now and they can offer you any number of accounts, savings accounts and term deposits all with different interest rates, fees and conditions.

                              How many of these bank accounts are truly aligned to the success of the customer, in this case the holiday maker? The holiday maker’s success in this case is to have a fantastic holiday. How many of these accounts help the holiday maker’s life easier simpler and more successful.

                              What could this account look like?

                              1.       It should be easy to set-up - perhaps an online account

                              2.       It should be easy to deposit funds – in person and online

                              3.       It should know the customer goals – how much money is needed and when

                              4.       It should provide a competitive interest rate – help the customer achieve the goal and don’t charge fees

                              5.       It should encourage regular saving – provide regular updates, show how much needs to be saved per week/per month and how close the goal is

                              6.       It should automatically pay the deposit and balance when they are due – don’t put the onus on the customer to make the payments, schedule the payments automatically

                              7.       It should be flexible enough to be used for buying things when on the holiday – don’t suspend activity on the account because of suspicious international transactions, the customer is on holiday

                              8.       It should be easy to close – when the holiday is finished and the customer returns home, close the account – no fees, just confirm the customer is safely home and close it.

                              If one bank can get this right, they will be on a winner and on their way to becoming outside in. Then someone will see there are other revenue opportunities in the customer value chain like insurance, what about if the bank partners with a hotel chain or airline so that the customer can get a discount on their holiday. Then there are the day trips, restaurants, shopping, photos & video, potential partnership and revenue opportunities for the bank but more importantly opportunities to make customers lives easier, simpler and more successful.  Success will breed success, the next thing might be a car account, then an education account, then who knows, maybe even a home account.

                              2 Comments
                               
                              << Previous
                                Linked
                                Picture

                                David Mottershead

                                Managing Consultant, Process & Customer Experience Advocate and Certified Process Master

                                Agile Organisations: Business and Process Transformation - Measuring, managing and improving business agility
                                Part 1 http://slidesha.re/9u7XVW
                                Part 2 http://slidesha.re/a3AOG1

                                RSS Feed

                                Archives

                                June 2011
                                May 2011
                                April 2011
                                March 2011
                                February 2011
                                November 2010
                                October 2010
                                September 2010
                                August 2010
                                July 2010
                                June 2010
                                May 2010
                                April 2010
                                March 2010
                                February 2010
                                January 2010
                                December 2009
                                November 2009
                                October 2009
                                September 2009
                                August 2009
                                July 2009
                                June 2009
                                May 2009

                                Categories

                                All
                                Amazon
                                American Express
                                Aol
                                Apple
                                Bain & Company
                                Balanced Scorecard
                                Banks
                                Barnes & Noble
                                Best Buy
                                Borders
                                Bpi
                                Bpm
                                Bpr
                                Brandz
                                British Airways
                                Carphone Warehouse
                                Change Management
                                China Mobile
                                Cisco
                                Coca Cola
                                Costco
                                Customer Capitalism
                                Customer Centricity
                                Customer Experience
                                Customer Feedback
                                Customer Loyalty
                                Dell
                                Disney
                                Easyjet
                                Enlightened Customer
                                Fantastic Furniture
                                Forrester
                                Ge
                                Gilead Systems
                                Godrej
                                Google
                                Government
                                Harvard Business Review
                                Healthcare
                                Icbc
                                Innovation
                                Inside Out
                                Jones Lang Lasalle
                                Lean
                                Maybank
                                Mcdonalds
                                Millward Brown Optimor
                                Moments Of Truth
                                Motorola
                                Nokia
                                Outside In
                                Outside In Software Development
                                Outside In
                                Outside In
                                Perth
                                Peter Drucker
                                Process Ninja
                                Procter & Gamble
                                Products
                                Profitability
                                Public Service
                                Real Estate
                                Ryanair
                                Sas
                                Six Sigma
                                Six Sigma And Lean
                                South West Airlines
                                Southwest
                                Starbucks
                                State Farm
                                Steve Towers
                                Successful Customer Outcomes
                                Successful Outcomes
                                Sundownder
                                Sundowner
                                Target
                                Telstra
                                Tesco
                                Toyota
                                Training
                                Transport Nsw
                                United Airlines
                                Virgin
                                Vodafone
                                Westpac
                                Whitepaper
                                Yahoo
                                Zappos
                                Zara

                                join our mailing list
                                * indicates required
                                Close


                              Website Hosting by Weebly.